Categories associated with best practice:
Determinants of Health: Personal health practices and coping skills, Social environments
This collaborative project aimed to initiate and evaluate the effects of a school-based physical activity program on physical fitness and mental health status of adolescents living in a low socioeconomic status area in Santiago, Chile. The study included 198 students aged 15 years old. Teachers and students designed the intervention program and decided on the best way to implement it. They developed a survey to assess students’ preferences for the activities to be included, and students decided that four units of different sports for 30 sessions each would be tested. Three sessions were held each week and each lasted 90 min. Methods: quasi-experimental design- other. Results: Significant differences were found between the intervention and control groups in maximum oxygen capacity (8.5% in the intervention versus 1.8% in the control group – p 0.01); anxiety score (decreased 13.7% in the intervention group versus 2.8% in the control group – p < 0.01), and self-esteem score (increased 2.3% in the intervention group and decreased 0.1% in the control – p 80%. Implications: These results show that a collaboratively developed school-based program to improve physical activity in adolescents of low socioeconomic status can obtain a high level of participation and achieve significant benefits in terms of physical fitness and mental health status.
Primary Source Document
M. Bonhauser, G. Fernandez, K. Püschel, F. Yañez1, J. Montero, B. Thompson, G. Coronado,, Improving physical fitness and emotional well-being in adolescents of low socioeconomic status in Chile: Results of a school-based controlled trial Health Promotion International
Contact information of developer(s) and/or implementer(s)
Family and Community Medicine Department at the Catholic University in Chile, the Municipal Local Health Department and the Fernando de Aragon High School in Puente Alto, Santiago.
|Intervention Goal / Objective||Level(s) Targeted||Equity Focus|
|Improving physical fitness among adolescents living in a low socioeconomic area.||People living in conditions of disadvantage are explicitly stated to be a target population of the intervention.|
|Consequently improving mental health status among adolescents of low socioeconomic status.||People living in conditions of disadvantage are explicitly stated to be a target population of the intervention.|
Health Issue(s) that is/are addressed by the Intervention
- Physical Activity
Specific Activities of the Intervention
- Curriculum changes in school
- Group process/program
Priority/Target Population for Intervention Delivery
- Youth (age 13-18 years)
- Elementary school
|Outcomes and Impact Chart|
|Level of Impact||Description of Outcome||Equity Focus|
|Individual Level||Mental health status indicator-Anxiety: A statistically significant improvement of 13.7% in the anxiety score was observed in the group that participated in the program compared with a reduction of 2.8% in the control group (p < 0.0001).||Outcomes are reported for people living in conditions of disadvantage, and are not compared to people living in more advantaged conditions.|
|Individual Level||Maximum oxygen capacity: Significant differences were found between the intervention and control groups (8.5% in the intervention versus 1.8% in the control group – p 0.01) after the end of the program.||Outcomes are reported for people living in conditions of disadvantage, and are not compared to people living in more advantaged conditions.|
|Individual Level||Speed & jump performance: Increased by 10.3% and 9.8% respectively in the intervention group, and by 6.9% and 2.4% in the group that received the standard intervention (p < 0.01)||Outcomes are reported for people living in conditions of disadvantage, and are not compared to people living in more advantaged conditions.|
|Individual Level||Mental health status indicator- Self-esteem: The self-esteem score increased by 2.3% in the intervention group, but decreased by 0.1% in the control group (p 0.001).|
- Implemented once (could be a pilot) - The intervention has been implemented once and is theoretically replicable elsewhere.
Expertise Required for Implementation within the Context of the Intervention
- Requires specialized skills that are easily available within the context - The intervention requires the participation of personnel with advanced skills (e.g. medical doctors, epidemiologists, social workers) but that are easily available within the intervention context.
Are there supports available for implementation
Are there resources and/or products associated with the interventions
Yes. The Tennessee Self-Concept Scale: a validated instrument which is used to measure self-esteem among Chilean adolescents from low socioeconomic status backgrounds.